Article 7
Unfortunately jsFiddle can't be used to respond with a 204/No Content. Could you then provide a test case somewhere on the web? A URL on a server of yourse maybe. You might want to have a look at the...
View ArticleArticle 6
Replying to anonymous: Pull request: https://github.com/jquery/jquery/pull/1142 +1 That's exactly what should happen!
View ArticleArticle 5
Replying to jaubourg: Could we have a test case that doesn't use mockjax? Because the test case in #13261 doesn't fail if and when you remove the contentType option. It doesn't make any sense since...
View ArticleArticle 4
Could we have a test case that doesn't use mockjax? Because the test case in #13261 doesn't fail if and when you remove the contentType option. It doesn't make any sense since the option is...
View Articlecc set
ccjaubourg added @jaubourg can you take a look? Seems like it should be calling the success callback.
View ArticleArticle 0
workaround is to add statusCode: { 204: function() { } } But backward comp breaks and AFAIK nothing in the release notes.
View Article